泭
泭
迡訄郇郇郋邿 訄訇郋迮 邾 迡郅 郇訄訄郅訄 郈郋訄郇訄郅邽郱邽迮邾 郋迠邽迡訄迮邾迮 赲迣郋迡 邽 邽郕邽, 赲郱訄郇郇迮 郈邽郋迮迡邽郇迮郇邽迮邾 迣郱訄郇訄 郕 衪苤 赲 迮郅郋邾 邽, 訇郋郅迮迮 郕郋郇郕迮郇郋, 赲 迮迮 迡郋赲郋邿 邾邽迣訄邽邽. 衪訄 訄 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽 郋郇郋赲訄郇訄 郇訄 郋訇郱郋迮 訄郕訄迡迮邾邽迮郕邽 訄迮邿, 郈郋郅邽邽迮郕邽 郋迮郋赲 邽 迡邽郕訄 赲 苤. 郋訄 訄 郋迮訄 郋郇郋赲訄郇訄 郇訄 訄郇訄郅邽郱迮 邾郈邽邽迮郕邽 迡訄郇郇, 郋訇訄郇郇 赲 訄邾郕訄 郋迣郋 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽 赲 迡赲 郅郋郕訄邽: 赲 郋郕赲迮 邽 赲 邽郕迮郕迮. 郋郅迮赲郋迮 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮 郈郋赲郋迡邽郅郋 郱邽邾郋邿 2016-2017 迣迣. 郇郋赲郇郋迮 赲郇邽邾訄郇邽迮 赲 郇迮邾 迡迮郅迮 迡赲邾 訄訄郕迮郇邾 赲邽迡訄邾 邾邽迣訄邽邽: 1) 迡郋赲訄 邾邽迣訄邽 邽 2) 訄郇迣訄郇邽郇訄 郋迣郋赲訄 邾邽迣訄邽. 郈郅迮郇邽迮 郋迣訄郇邽郱郋赲訄郇郋 赲 郋邾 迠迮 郈郋迡郕迮: 赲郋-郈迮赲, 邾 郋訇迡邽邾 訄訄郕迮 衪苤 邽 郈邽郋迮迡邽郇迮郇邽迮 迣郱訄郇訄 郕 郇迮邾 郇訄 郋郇郋赲迮 郋訇郱郋訄 郅邽迮訄; 郱訄迮邾 郋訇迡邽邾 赲郅邽郇邽迮 衪苤 郇訄 迠邽郱郇 郕迣郱郕邽 迡郋赲 邾邽迣訄郇郋赲 赲 郋郕赲迮; 邽 郇訄郕郋郇迮, 赲郅邽郇邽迮 衪苤 郇訄 訄郇迣訄郇邽郇 郋迣郋赲郅, 赲郱赲 赲 郕訄迮赲迮 郈邽邾迮訄 郋迡郋邿 郕郈郇迮邿邽邿 郇郋郕 赲 虷迮郇訄郅郇郋邿 郱邽邽. 訄迮邾 邾 郈郋郈訄迮邾 郋訇郋訇邽 赲迮 迡訄郇郇迮 赲 赲赲郋迡訄.
郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮 郈郋赲郋迡邽郅郋 郈邽 郈郋迡迡迮迠郕迮 衪郕郋郇郋邾邽迮郕郋邿 邽 郋邽訄郅郇郋邿 郕郋邾邽邽邽 迣訄郇邽郱訄邽邽 訇迮迡邽郇迮郇郇 訄邽邿 迡郅 郱邽邽 邽 苠邽郋迣郋 郋郕迮訄郇訄.
泭
泭
郋郅迮迡郇邽迮 郈迮訄郅郇迮 郋訇邽 赲 郋邽邿郕郋邿 苳迮迡迮訄邽邽: 迮郋邽邽迮郕邽邿 訄郕 赲 邾迮郋, 郇迮邽邿 迠邽郱郇邽 15-邽 郋邽邿郕邽 迣訄迠迡訄郇, 邽 郈郋郅迮迡郋赲訄赲邽迮 郱訄 邽邾 訄迮 郈邽郕郋赲訄郅邽 赲郇邽邾訄郇邽迮 郋訇迮赲迮郇郇郋邽 郕 迣郱訄郇 郋迡邽郇迮 郈迮迡郈郋郅訄迣訄迮邾 迮郋邽郋赲. 訄郇郇迮 郋訇邽 郋迮郇 郋郋郋 赲郈邽赲訄 赲 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄迮郅郕 迣邽郈郋迮郱 訄邾迮邽郕訄郇郕郋迣郋 迮郇郋迣郋 郋訄 苠訄郕迮訄, 赲迮迠迡訄迮迣郋, 郋 郈郋迡訄赲郅迮迮 訇郋郅邽郇赲郋 郕迮邾邽郋赲 邽 迮郋邽郋赲 邽郱 虷迮郇訄郅郇郋邿 郱邽邽 訄迡邽郕訄郅邽郱 赲 郋邽邽. 訄郇郇郋迮 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮 郈訄迮 郈郋郇 郇訄郕郋郅郕郋 郈邽邾迮郇邽邾訄 迣邽郈郋迮郱訄 苠訄郕迮訄 郕 邾邽迣訄郇訄邾 邽郱 迣郱訄郇訄 邽 郕訄郕邽迮 訄郕郋 郈郋郋訇赲, 訄 郕訄郕邽迮 郈迮郈赲 訄迡邽郕訄郅邽郱訄邽邽 迣郱訄郇郕邽 邾邽迣訄郇郋赲. 郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮 郈郋赲郋迡邽郅郋 赲 2016-17迣迣. 郈邽 郈郋迡迡迮迠郕迮 郋邽訄 赲 迣郱訄郇迮 邽 訇訄郱邽迮 郇訄 訇郋郅迮迮 40 迣郅訇邽郇郇 邽郇迮赲 郕郈迮訄邾邽 邽郱 訄郱郅邽郇 訄郇 邽 c 迣郱郕邽邾邽 邾邽迣訄郇訄邾邽 赲 郋邽邽.
衪邾邽郅 訄邽迡邽郇郋赲 迡郋迮郇 郕訄迮迡 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽, 邾迮邽郕訄郇郕郋迣郋 苺郇邽赲迮邽迮訄 虷迮郇訄郅郇郋邿 郱邽邽. 郇郋赲郇迮 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄迮郅郕邽迮 邽 郈迮郈郋迡訄赲訄迮郅郕邽迮 邽郇迮迮: 邾邽迣訄邽, 迮郅邽迣邽 邽 迣郋郋迡郕訄 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽.
泭
泭
苤迮赲 訄郱郅邽郇迮 郋郈迮迡迮郅迮郇邽 郈郋郇邽 郇郋郕郋郇郋邾邽郕邽. 郱郕郋邾 邾郅迮 郈郋迡 郇郋郕郋郇郋邾邽郕郋邿 郈郋郇邽邾訄迮 迮迣邾迮郇 郇訄邽郋郇訄郅郇郋邿 郕郋郇郋邾邽郕邽, 郈迮迡訄赲郅迮郇郇邿 訄迡邽邽郋郇郇邾邽 訄訄邽迮郕邽邾邽 郋郱邿赲迮郇郇邾邽 郕郅訄迡訄邾邽, 赲 邽郋郕郋邾 邾郅迮 郋 郈迮邽邽迮郕訄 郋邾訄 郇訄邽郋郇訄郅郇郋邿 郕郋郇郋邾邽郕邽 [迮郇邽郋赲訄, 訄迡郋赲迮郅, 2000].
郋 赲迮 赲訄迠郇 迮訄 迠邽郱郇迮迡迮迮郅郇郋邽 郋訇迮赲訄 赲 迣郱訄郇迮 迠迮 郈郋赲郅郅邽 邽 郈郋赲郅 訄郕 邽郅邽 邽郇訄迮 郇郋郕郋郇郋邾邽迮郕邽迮 迮, 郋 迮 郇迮郕邽邿 郇訄訇郋 郕訄迮赲, 郈邽邽 郋邾 邽郅邽 邽郇郋邾 郇郋 邽 赲迣郋迡郇郋 郋郅邽訄赲邽, 郈郕訄邿 邽 郋訇郋訇迮郇郇郋, 郋 郈迮迡訄赲邽迮郅迮邿 迡迣邽 郇郋郕郋郇郋邾邽郕 (赲 迡訄郇郇郋邾 郅訄迮 迮 邽迡迮 郋 邾邽郕郋郕郋郇郋邾邽郕訄). 虷迮郅迮 訄邿郋郇, 郇訄迮郅迮郇郇迮, 郇訄郈邽邾迮, 迡郇迣訄郇訄邾邽 邽郅邽 郕郋迮邿訄邾邽, 郋郕訄郱赲訄郅邽 郅邽迡迮訄邾邽 赲 赲訄邽赲訄郇邽邽 邽 郈迮迮訄訇郋郕迮 郋郈迮迡迮郅迮郇郇 迮郅郕郋郋郱邿赲迮郇郇 郕郅. 訄 郈郋邾郅迮郇郇 郈迮迡郈邽邽 迡郋邾邽郇邽郋赲訄郅邽 邽郇迠迮郇迮郇郋-迮郇邽迮郕邽迮 郕訄迡, 郕訄郕 郈邽邾迮, 郅訄赲郇郕郋邿, 郇迮邾迮郕郋邿, 郕郋迮邿郕郋邿 郇訄邽郋郇訄郅郇郋邽, 赲 邽郇訄郇郋赲郋邾 邽 訇郋赲郋邾 迮郕郋迮 訇郋郅邽 郈迮郋赲 迡郋邽迣訄郅邽 迮 迠迮 郈迮迡訄赲邽迮郅邽 迮赲迮邿郕郋邿 郇訄邽郋郇訄郅郇郋邽 邽郅邽 邽郱 郱訄郕訄赲郕訄郱郕邽 迮郈訇郅邽郕. 苺迠迮 赲 郋赲迮郕邽迮 迣郋迡 訇郅邽 郈迮迡郈郋迮郇邽 郕郋赲郋迡邽迮郅迮邿 郕郈郇 郈迮迡郈邽邽邿 郈郋 迮邾 邽郅邽 邽郇邾 郈迮邽訄郅郇郋邾 訇訄 迮 邽郅邽 邽郇 郈迮迡訄赲邽迮郅迮邿 郇郋郋赲. 郋 迠迮 赲迮邾 邾郋郇邾邽 迮邾郈訄邾邽 郋 郅郋邿 苠 邽 郈郋迮邽郋郇訄郅郋赲 郕郋迮郇郇, 訄赲郋郋郇郇 郇郋郋赲 郋郱郇 迮郈訇郅邽郕. 苠訄郕邽邾 郋訇訄郱郋邾, 郈郋邽郋迡邽郅訄 郕郋郅郋訄郅郇訄 訄郇郋邾訄邽 邾郇郋迣邽 郈迮迡訄赲邽迮郅迮邿 迡訄郇郇 郇郋郋赲.
訄郇郇迮 郈郋迮 郇訄 訄邾郋邾 迡迮郅迮 迣郅訇郋郕郋 郇迮 邽郱迮郇, 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽邾 訄郕郋迣郋 郋迡訄 邾迮訄 郕訄郕 訄迮 迮迮郋邽郈, 郅郋迠郇郋 郈郋郇迮 郈邽郇邽郈 郇邽迮郕郋邿 郋郅迮訄郇郇郋邽, 訄郕 邽 郋赲邽迮 郱郕邽 郈迮邽訄郅邽郋赲 邽邾迮郇郇郋 赲 迮迮 郇郋郕郋郇郋邾邽郕邽.
. . 訄邽邾郋赲 赲郅迮 訄赲郋郋邾 訄郱郅邽郇 訄迮邿 郇訄郇郋迣郋 邽 郈訇郅邽邽邽迮郕郋迣郋 訄訄郕迮訄, 訄 訄郕迠迮 郕郋邾邾迮郇訄郋郋邾 邽 郕郈迮郋邾 迡訄 苤 郈郋郋赲迮郕郋迣郋 郈郋訄郇赲訄 郈郋 邽郋郕郋邾 郕迣 赲郋郈郋郋赲.
泭
泭
This lecture considers the past 60 years of social and cultural anthropological research in Central Asia explores what has held the field back for so long, and why and how it has become so productive in the past decade. I seek to stimulate a conversation about the value and potential of anthropology of Central Asia, and the reasons it has been slow to develop as an academic field. How can we expand its potential moving forward? What kind of institutional and other support is still needed and how can we improve its contributions to the wider field of anthropology? My analysis is rooted in comparisons among institutional contexts of anthropology in different countries of Europe, North America and elsewhere, as well as among programs and accomplishments of anthropological research in different areas of Eurasia. Although there are many questions and few clear answers, part of the task undertaken here is to refine the questions and identify relevant examples of academic success in the study of Eurasia.
Nathan Light received his PhD from Indiana University in 1998, and is now a researcher at the Department of Anthropology and Ethnology at Uppsala University, Sweden. He has conducted field research in northwest China and Kyrgyzstan and has published on economic anthropology, cultural performance and history in Central Asia, including the volume Intimate Heritage: Creating Uyghur Muqam Song in Xinjiang (2008). He spent five years as a researcher at the Max Planck institute for Social Anthropology investigating history, kinship, ritual and economy in Kyrgyzstan. He was part of the project Genealogy and History: collective identities in independent Kyrgyzstan funded by VolkswagenStiftung, and is now engaged in the project Embedded in History: A study of Kyrgyz historicity and historical consciousness that investigates forms of historical knowledge in Kyrgyzstan, funded by the Swedish Riksbankens Jubileumsfond.
泭
泭
Hygiene is a purely cultural concept and as such falls into the categories of tabooisation, what makes it a lovely subject for an anthropologist. Hygiene is also a growing field addressed by development politics and practices. This presentation is to reflex on research conducted in 2009 on EcoSanToiletts projects in Kyrgyzstan, with an aim to inspire for more toilet papers.
Malgorzata (Gosia) Biczyk, cultural anthropologists. Born in communist Poland, educated in Warsaw, Bishkek and Halle. From 2003 in complicated love relationship with Central Asia and anthropology of this region. Currently works as an integrated expert in environmental NGO in Bishkek.
泭
泭
The aim of presentation is to critically examine one of the most vibrant, controversial and multi-sided contemporary urban sub-cultures: graffiti and street art. Although globally spread, this specific creative form has still not been properly addressed as a legitimate scientific topic: so far, not many useful, theoretically and methodologically founded and comparative studies have been written about it. Presentation will include these sub-topics: definition of main terms; types and techniques of graffiti and street art; sites of meaning of graffiti; qualitative and quantitative approaches in researching graffiti; and methods of researching them. Ambition of the presentation, which includes dozens of original photos from different parts of the world, is to go beyond only aesthetic dimensions of graffiti and to reach its broader ideological aspects and concrete political potentials.
Dr. Mitja Velikonja is a Professor for Cultural Studies and head of Center for Cultural and Religious Studies at University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Main areas of his research include Central-European and Balkan political ideologies, subcultures and graffiti culture, collective memory and post-socialist nostalgia. His last monographs in English language are Rock'n'Retro - New Yugoslavism in Contemporary Slovenian Music (Ljubljana; 2013), Titostalgia A Study of Nostalgia for Josip Broz (Ljubljana; 2008 ), Eurosis A Critique of the New Eurocentrism (Ljubljana; 2005 ) and Religious Separation and Political Intolerance in Bosnia-Herzegovina (TAMU Press; 2003). He is the co-author of the book in Serbian Celestial Yugoslavia: Interaction of Political Mythologies and Popular Culture (Belgrade; 2012) and the co-editor of the book Post-Yugoslavia - New Cultural and Political Perspectives (Palgrave; 2014). For his achievements he received four national and one international award. He was a full-time visiting professor at Jagiellonian University in Krakow (2002 and 2003), at Columbia University in New York (2009 and 2014), at University of Rijeka (2015), at New York Institute in St. Petersburg (2015 and 2016), Fulbright visiting researcher at Rosemont College in Philadelphia (2004/2005) and research fellow at The Netherlands Institute of Advanced Studies in Wassenaar (2012).
泭
泭
Migrants worldwide are increasingly seen as assets by their home countries given the developmental potential of remittances and the rise of transnational practices and outlooks. Accordingly, to sustain these remittance flows and encourage return, sending countries are moving towards adopting diaspora support policies such as external voting rights, diaspora bonds, or portable social rights. Where does Kyrgyzstan --the second most remittance-dependent country in the world stand on this? What can it learn from other countries?
Vanessa Ruget is Associate Professor of political science at Salem State University (Massachusetts, USA), teaching courses focusing on developing countries, democratization, and global poverty. In the past, she taught political science at the American University Central Asia and at the OSCE Academy in Bishkek as well as in France and in Kosovo. She received her Ph.D. in 2000 from the University of Bordeaux (France). Her current research focuses on labor migration in Central Asia; she was recently awarded a Fulbright Flex Research Award to Kyrgyzstan.
泭
泭
訄郇郇訄 郈迮郱迮郇訄邽 郋郇郋赲訄郇訄 郇訄 迡訄郇郇 郈郋郅迮赲 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽邿 郋訇訄郇郇 郅迮郋邾 郈郋郅郋迣郋 迣郋迡訄 赲 迮郅迮 衪郕邽-訄郇 訄郇郕郋邿 郋訇郅訄邽. 迮郱郅訄 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽 郋赲迮邽郅邽 郇迮 郋郅郕郋 郇訄 迣郅訄赲郇邿 赲郋郈郋 郋 郋郅邽 郋邾訄郅郇 邽 郇迮郋邾訄郅郇 訄郕郋郋赲 赲 郈郋迮迮 郈訄赲郅迮郇邽 赲郋迡郇邾邽 迮訄邾邽, 郇郋 訄郕 迠迮 訄郕郅邽 赲郋郈郋, 郅迮迠訄邽迮 赲 郈郅郋郕郋邽 迡迮郕郋迣郋 迡訄, 迣迮郇迡迮郇郋迣郋 訄赲迮郇赲訄, 訇迮郱郋郈訄郇郋邽 邽 郱迡郋郋赲.
*訄郇郇訄 郈迮郱迮郇訄邽 郋郇郋赲訄郇訄 郇訄 迡訄郇郇 郈郋郅迮赲 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽邿 郈郋赲迮迡迮郇郇 MSRI 赲 訄邾郕訄 郈郋迮郕 ESPA (Ecosystems Services for Poverty Alleviation).
郅郇 訄郈訄郅郋赲訄 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣, 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄迮郅 赲 郇邽迮 郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽 郋郇 苤郋郋訇迮赲, 苺郇邽赲迮邽迮 虷迮郇訄郅郇郋邿 郱邽邽. 迡邽郇 邽郱 迣郅訄赲郇 邽郇迮迮郋赲 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽迮郕邽 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽邿 郅郇 赲郕郅訄迮 邽郱迮郇邽迮 郇迮郋邾訄郅郇郋迣郋 郋訇迮郇邽 赲 迣郱郕郋邾 郋訇迮赲迮.
泭
泭
In November 2016 Daler was invited to participate in a field visit to Nepal with the extended project team. Coming from the Eastern Pamirs, with its different historical legacies such as imperialism, socialism, and post-socialism, he found his visit to Nepal culturally unique, historically different, yet very similar in terms of current developments. Nepal has experienced its own history of geopolitics and process of nation-building, but a similar commodification of culture and landscape for tourism purposes happens there today. His talk will be about Nepal as a developing country, Kathmandu as a capital city, the Kanchenjunga Conservation Area as nature and culture, and Walung village as a significant crossroad of trade and exchange and a juncture in a truly global network. He will try to explain what is happening with development in the highlands of Asia, how borders, trade and exchange play important roles, and what is happening with conservation efforts, cross-border business, and tourism. The focus will be the contemporary dynamics in remote and mountains areas of developing countries. His main ideas is that one of the remotest place in the Himalayas, Walung, has never been disconnected from the outside world. He will discuss the annual monastery festival known as Phutuk, a time when many Walung people living in Kathmandu, Darjeeling, or abroad come back to the village in order to celebrate the festival. Phutuk is an old festival, which survived and is now celebrated in the age of globalization. Having seen the rituals performed during the festival, he feels the importance of a sense of place and cultural belonging in the global context today.
This field trip was part of the research project Remoteness & Connectivity: Highland Asia in the World to which Daler is contributing. The overarching aim of this five-year project funded by the European Research Council (ERC) is to gain a better comparative understanding of the mountainous areas between the Pamirs and the eastern slopes of the Himalayas, their interconnections, and the stakes and perspectives of their local communities. See www.highlandasia.net for more information on its various subprojects and activities.
Bio: Daler is a minoring student at the AUCAs Anthropology department and one of the first graduating students of the newly established Environmental Management and Sustainable Development program.
泭
迡訄郇郇郋邿 訄訇郋迮 邾 邽郅迮迡迮邾, 郕訄郕 迮郅邽迣邽 訇郋迮 郱訄 赲郋迮 郈郋訄郇赲郋 赲 迣郋郋迡迮 邽郕迮郕. 訄迮迮 邽郅郋 郈訄郕邽郕邽 邾郅邾訄郇 赲迮迠迡訄迮 赲郋迮 郈訄赲郋 訇 赲 迣郋郋迡迮, 迠邽 郋迣郅訄郇郋 赲郋邽邾 迮郅邽迣邽郋郱郇邾 郈邽郇邽郈訄邾 邽 郋郱迡訄赲訄 邽郅訄邾郕邽迮 邾邽郕郋-郈郋訄郇赲訄. 苠訄郕邽迮 郈邽郱訄郇邽 郇迮 郋訄 郇迮郋郈訄邽赲訄迮邾邾邽 邽, 訄郕 郕訄郕 迮郅邽迣邽郋郱郇郋邿 邽迡迮郇邽郇郋邽 迮 邽郅郇邿 赲邽郱訄郅郇邿 郕郋邾郈郋郇迮郇, 迮郅邽迣邽郋郱郇迮 郈訄郕邽郕邽 訄郋 訄郇郋赲 郈迮迡邾迮訄邾邽 郋郋邿 郋訇迮赲迮郇郇郋邿 迡邽郕邽邽, 郕訄郕 郈郋邽郱郋郅郋 赲 郅訄迮 訇邽郅訇郋迡訄邾邽 郅迮郋邾 2016 迣郋迡訄. 苠訄郕邽迮 郈郋 訄郋 郇訄郕郅訄迡赲訄 郇訄 郋邽訄郅郇郋 郕郋郇邽郋赲訄郇郇迮 迣迮郇迡迮郇迮 邽迮訄邽邽, 邽 邾 郇訄訇郅迡訄迮邾, 郕訄郕 迮郅邽迣邽郋郱郇迮/赲迮郕郋迮 郋郈訄邽赲訄郇邽迮 郋訇迮赲迮郇郇郋迣郋 郈郋訄郇赲訄 郈迮赲訄訄迮 赲 邾迠郕郋迮 郋郈訄邽赲訄郇邽迮 迠迮郇郕郋迣郋, 赲 郕郋郋郋邾 郋訇迮 郋郋郇 (邽 迮郅邽迣邽郋郱郇訄 邽 赲迮郕訄), 郈迮迡訄赲郅迮郇郇迮 邽郅郇邾邽 郈訄邽訄訄郅郇邾邽 邽迣訄邾邽, 郈迮迮郇迡 郇訄 郋, 郋 郱郇訄, 郕訄郕 迠迮郇邽郇 迡郋郅迠郇 郋迡迮赲訄. 迡郇訄郕郋 郕訄郕 郈郋郕訄郱赲訄迮 郇訄迮 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮, 邽郕迮郕郕邽迮 迠迮郇邽郇 郇迮 郋郋訇迮郇郇郋 郇迠迡訄 赲 邾郋迡郇 郋赲迮訄 郋 邾迠邽郇. 郅訄邾郕邽迮 迠迮郇郕邽迮 郈訄郕邽郕邽 邽 迡赲邽迠迮郇邽迮 郱訄 郈訄赲訄 邾郅邾訄郇郕邽 迠迮郇邽郇 郇訄訇邽訄郅邽 郋訇郋郋 赲 迣郋郋迡迮 迮迮 90- 迣郋迡郋赲 邽 郇訄 迮迣郋迡郇郇邽邿 迡迮郇 郋郱迡訄郅邽 邾郋郇邿 邽邾郈郅 郋 赲郋迮邿 郇迮郱訄赲邽邽邾郋邿 訄迮郕郋邽迮邿. 迮郇邽郇 赲 邽迡迠訄訇訄 迮迣郋迡郇 訄郅邽 赲訄迠郇郋邿 赲邽郱訄郅郇郋邿 邽 郋邽訄郅郇郋邿 郋訄赲郅迮邿 迣郋郋迡訄 郋 赲郋邽邾邽 郈邽郱訄郇邽邾邽 郇訄 迣郋郋迡郕郋迮 郈郋訄郇赲郋. 迡訄郇郇郋邿 訄訇郋迮 邾 訄邾郋邽邾, 郕訄郕 郋邾邽 郋訇迮赲迮郇郇迮 迡邽郕 赲郋郕迣 邽迡迠訄訇訄 赲 邽郕迮郕迮 邽 郕訄郕 郋 郋訄迠訄迮 郇訄 迠邽郱郇邽 郈訄郕邽郕邽 邾郅邾訄郇郋郕.
衪邾邽郅 訄邽迡邽郇郋赲, 迡郋迮郇 郕訄迮迡 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽, 苺虷.泭
迣郅 衪迮郇訄邾訄郇郋赲訄, 邽.郋.迡郋迮郇訄 郕訄迮迡 苳邽郅郋郋邽邽 邽 郋邽訄郅郇郋-迣邾訄郇邽訄郇 郇訄郕, 迣郱郕訄 郋迡訄赲迮郇郇訄 衩邽迡邽迮郕訄 郕訄迡迮邾邽.
迡迮郅郇郋迮 郈訄邽訇郋 - 郱訄 邽郇郋邾訄邽 邽 郈郋邾郋 赲 郈郋赲迮迡迮郇邽邽 郋郈郋訄 - 訄邾訄郅 苳郋郇訇迮郕 郕郱 邽 郱訄 郈郋邾郋 赲 郋訇訄訇郋郕迮 迡訄郇郇 Aigerim Musaeva.
泭
泭
Since the end of the WWII Germany has experienced several so called waves of migration. Different types of refugees were always presented in the flows of resettlers. Part of them originate from the ex-Soviet republics. Although nowadays most of the Post-Soviet countries are peaceful, there are still a lot of people, who seek asylum in Germany alongside with refugees from Syria, Irak or Afghanistan. Why did they flee? Why did they choose Germany as a desired destination? Was Germany theit first choice? What life projects in Germany do they have? These and other questions were in focus of the research, conducted from April 2014 till August 2015 in asylums of Berlin and Bavaria. The research was based on the participant observation and biographical interviews with refugees from Latvia, Russia, Turkmenistan and the Ukraine. Comparative and case-study analysis revealed, that refugees' reasons for moving to Germany often involve both push and pull factors. The decision is not obligatory due to hard life circumstances or need to flee wars, unrest, human rights abuse or poverty. The reasons for migration vary by the countries of origin, but also have common features. The main finding of the research is that the narration about the motives of migration has two modes: official and informal. Some stories, told by the same people in a different time, drastically differ from each other. The research contributes to a better understanding of migrants' experience, because it provides insights into their individual stories and examine challenges they undergo in Germany.
Alena Zelenskaia was born Rostov-on-Don, Russia, in 1988. She received B.A. degree in international journalism from the Southern Federal University in 2009. During the university period she freelanced in different city newspapers and magazines. In 2011 Alena graduated with M.A. degree in international relations from St. Petersburg State University and continued PhD studies there. However, an exchange year abroad - in Germany - reversed her academic interests in a new direction and interrupted her work on the PhD dissertation. Instead of it Alena wrote her second Master thesis on refugeehood and obtained M.A. degree in cultural anthropology from the European University in St. Petersburg.
泭
泭
Why might a university want students to be in couples? How is the university, as an institution, rooted in heterosexual marriage? Based on extensive fieldwork at private, Catholic university in the United States, this paper will look at the ways that sexuality on campus is not just taking place between students, but as part of larger institutional forces and outcomes. To investigate this it will look at the ways that two particular events discuss and place heterosexuality and the successful pairing off of students as key elements for the students and put forward a desired ideology surrounding courtship. Further, the presentation will explore the ways that the events and the structure of them set up specific heterosexual couplings and set out a vision of the events, and even the campus, as a place for heterosexual pairing off and marriage, and the fashion that this is critical to the student experience and their perception of the university as a whole.
Frank G. Karioris, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Sociology & General Education at the 2023 51勛圖. He has a PhD from Central European University in Comparative Gender Studies with a Specialization in Sociology & Social Anthropology. He has published on various topics including masculinities, higher education, and liminality. His most recent book is Masculinities Under Neoliberalism (Zed Books, 2016) which he co-edited with Dr. Andrea Cornwall and Dr Nancy Lindisfarne.
泭
泭
About 30 years ago the ethnic Kyrgyz community from Pakistan came as refugees to eastern Turkey. After four years of refugee life in northern Pakistan they were brought to Turkey in 1982 with about 4,000 other refugees. Their motherland was in the Pamir valleys of Afghanistan before their exodus to the Pakistan after the Saur Revolution in 1979 in Kabul.
Nowadays according to the Statistical Committee of TR there are about 1720 people living in the village of Ulupamir relating to the Van region of Turkish Republic.
The biggest tragedy for the ethnic Kyrgyz community in Ulupamir village until now is the migration process which had a strong influence on formation of their ethnic boundaries and identity. During this process, they have established economic, political and cultural relations with different ethnic groups. This case has affected everyday life, cultural traits and the socio-economic structure of the Kyrgyz community.
Key words: Forced Migration, Ethnicity, Ethnic Boundaries, Culture, Cultural - Economic Change
Bio: Zarina is a freelance researcher, who recently completed her Masters degree in anthropology from the Hacettepe University, Turkey. Prior to that she received BA in communication in the Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University. Zarina has always been interested in the themes of beliefs, religion, religious practices, ethnicity and gender.
泭
泭
Abstract: In the 1990s, men and women all over Kyrgyzstan were faced with a crisis - how to feed, clothe, shelter and provide for themselves and their children? After the collapse of the Soviet empire, the heavy subsides Kyrgyzstan enjoyed during USSRs reign disappeared virtually overnight, leaving an entire country reeling from severe economic shock. Women, by and large, made painful decisions to leave their children and families and travel (on the very first charter flights) to unknown countries in order to provide for their families. The shuttle trade was dominated by women in the 1990s. These unsung heroes jump-started the Kyrgyz economy at great personal cost. In 1996, I arrived in the midst of this decade as a young UN volunteer, twenty years later, I share my impressions with Bishkek millennialsleast they forget.
Bio: has over twenty years of humanitarian and human rights work in Central Asia, Africa and the Balkans focusing on gender-based violence, conflict/post-conflict environments, UN reform and ending child sex abuse. She completed her Ph.D. at London School of Economics. Her publications and media are listed here: www.LoriHandrahan.com
泭
泭
苠迮郱邽: 郇邽迮邿郕邽迮 郕迣郱 - 郋 郇訄郋迡, 郕郋郋邿 郈郋迠邽赲訄郅 郇訄 迮邽郋邽邽 迮郕邽 郇邽迮邿 赲 迮迡郇邽迮 赲迮郕訄 邽 郋郱迡訄郅 郋迡郇 邽郱 訄邾 邾郋迣迮赲迮郇郇 邽邾郈迮邽邿 郇訄 迮邽郋邽邽 赲訄郱邽邽. 郇訄郋迮迮 赲迮邾 郇迮郕郋郅郕郋 郇訄郋迡郋赲 郈迮迮郇迡 郇訄 郋郅 郈郋郋邾郕郋赲 迮郇邽迮邿郕邽 郕迣郱郋赲. 苤迮迡邽 訄郕邽 郇訄郋迡郋赲 訄郕訄, 郈郋迡郋郅迠訄邽迮 郇訄迮郅 迮邽郋邽 郇邽迮, 邽 郋赲迮邾迮郇郇迮 郕迣郱, 迠邽赲邽迮 赲 迣郱訄郇迮. 郅邽 訄郕訄, 郈郋迠邽赲訄邽迮 郇訄 邽郕郋郇郇郋邿 迮邽郋邽邽 迮郇邽迮邿郕邽 郕迣郱郋赲, 訄邽郅邽 赲郋迮 訄邾郋郇訄郱赲訄郇邽迮 "郕迣郱" 邽 訄郅邽 郇訄郱赲訄 訄郕訄訄邾邽, 郋 郋赲迮邾迮郇郇迮 郕迣郱, 郇訄郋訇郋郋, 郋訄郇邽郅邽 郋 迡迮赲郇邽邿 郇郋郇邽邾 "郕迣郱", 郇郋 郈迮迮迮郅邽郅邽 迡訄郅迮郕郋 郱訄 郈迮迡迮郅 衩迠郇郋邿 苤邽訇邽邽. 訄 郈迮郱迮郇訄邽邽 訇迡 訄邾訄邽赲訄 郈郋郇邽 "郇郋郇邽邾" 邽 "郇郋郈郋郅邽郋郇邽邾", 郋訇迠迡訄 郈邽郇迮 赲 郋邽邽訄郅郇郋邿 邽郋邽郋迣訄邽邽 迮郋邽邽 郈郋邽郋迠迡迮郇邽 郋赲迮邾迮郇郇 郕迣郱郋赲 邽 訄郕訄郋赲, 訄 訄郕迠迮 郈迮迡郅訄迣訄 郇郋赲迮 郇迮訄迡邽邽郋郇郇迮 郋郕邽 郱迮郇邽 郇訄 郇邽迮郕 邽郋邽 邽 郈郋邽郋迠迡迮郇邽迮 迡赲 郇訄郋迡郋赲. 迮郱迮郇訄邽 訇訄郱邽迮 郇訄 郈郋郅迮赲郋邾 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽邽, 郈郋赲迮迡迮郇郇郋邾 赲 迣. 訇訄郕訄郇, 迮郈訇郅邽郕訄 苭訄郕訄邽, 赲 邽郇迮 2016 迣郋迡訄.
虴郋訄迮赲訄 虴郋郅郈郋郇 迠迮郇邽訇迮郕郋赲郇訄, 迡郋郕郋 邽郋邽迮郕邽 郇訄郕, 郈郋迮郋 郈郋迣訄邾邾 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽邽 邾迮邽郕訄郇郕郋迣郋 郇邽赲迮邽迮訄 虷迮郇訄郅郇郋邿 郱邽邽. 訄郇邽邾訄迮 赲郋郈郋訄邾邽 邾迮迠郇邽迮郕邽 郋郇郋迮郇邽邿, 郇訄邽郋郇訄郅郇郋-迣迡訄赲迮郇郇郋迣郋 郋邽迮郅赲訄, 郱郕郋赲郋邿 郈郋郅邽邽郕邽 赲 迣郱訄郇迮. 郇訄郋迮迮 赲迮邾 邽郇迮迮迮 郈郋訇郅迮邾訄邾邽 赲 郋訇郅訄邽 邽郋邽邽 邽 訄迮郋郅郋迣邽邽 迣郱訄郇訄.
虴迮郈訄郕郋赲 訄郋 郅迮郕訄郇迡郋赲邽, 邾訄迣邽訄郇 訄郕郅迮訄 邽郋邽邽 迣郱郕郋迣郋 訄邽郋郇訄郅郇郋迣郋 苺郇邽赲迮邽迮訄. 訄郕郋郇邽郅 郋迡迮郅迮郇邽迮 邾迮迠迡郇訄郋迡郇 郋郇郋迮郇邽邿 苺郇邽赲迮邽迮訄 訄郱邽 赲 迣. 郇郕訄訄, 苠邽. 郇訄郋迮迮 赲迮邾 郈邽迮 邾訄迣邽迮郕 迡邽迮訄邽, 郈郋赲迮郇郇 邽郱迮郇邽 赲郋郈郋郋赲, 赲郱訄郇郇 郇郋郇邽邾郋邾 "郕迣郱" 邽 郈郋邽郋迠迡迮郇邽迮邾 郋迡郋郈郅迮邾迮郇郇 赲郱迮邿 訄郕訄郋赲.
泭
泭
For approximately 1 year, the European Union has been gripped by social and political crisis brought on by the influx of undocumented refugees from global trouble spots, such as Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite having legislation in place to handle such situations theoretically, the unprecedented numbers of refugees have exposed the weakness of the EUs policy in practice and especially the divisions within the union itself spectacularly exposed through this springs Brexit vote. While many segments of European society have been largely understanding of the need to act on behalf of these refugees, engaging in discourses about human rights and a presupposed moral leadership that the EU must promote, an increasingly vocal part of European society has been less generous. The anti-refugee movement is due in part to the continuing economic weakness of the union since 2007, with unemployment hitting record highs in many countries, though an increasing xenophobic feeling is on the rise across the continent, led by a growing number of populist and nationalist parties that are disappointed by and sceptical of the EUs integrationist policy agenda. Against this background, this presentation will look at the crisis, attempt to highlight the facts from the fiction, and take the example of one of the EUs smaller members Finland to examine the fractious discussions in society that the refugee (and more generally a migration) discussion have exposed.
Paul Fryer is Adjunct Professor and lecturer in Human Geography at the University of Eastern Finland, as well as co-ordinator of the universitys international Masters Degree Programme Border Crossings: Global and Local Societies in Transition. Having written on ethnic minorities in Russia and migration processes in the post-Soviet space, Paul Fryer has been involved in 3 projects on borders and migration in the former Soviet republics and led the Academy of Finland funded project Homes, Phones and Development: Longing and transnationality through new technologies at the Central Asian-Russian and the Thai-Burmese borders in 2012-13. Currently, Paul Fryer is conducting research on Central Asian labour migrants in Russian cities with Academy of Finland funding.
泭
泭
Why do informal economic practices persist and reproduce? The dominant new-institutionalist answer to this question suggests that the states failure to introduce market-enhancing institutions (e.g. the rule of law, security of private property and contract enforcement mechanisms) prevents informally operating actors from formalising their entrepreneurial activities. Relying on a Polanyian institutionalist perspective, in this talk I emphasize the importance of yet another type of failure, namely the states incapacity or unwillingness to complement market-enhancing institutions (marketization) with market-constraining/social regulations and institutions for social protection. I argue that this second type of failure triggers the informalization of the reaction to or countermovement against the marketization process. The informalization of the countermovement, in turn, reproduces the reliance on informal economic practices and subverts the marketization process. I demonstrate the argument based on ethnographic evidence on petty trade in Tbilisi and discuss: [1] petty traders resistance to market-enhancing reforms; [2] the states unwillingness to address this resistance and accommodate the traders interests; [3] subsequent informalization of the countermovement involving street-level officials informal interventions; and [4] the shortcomings of the informalized countermovement.
Lela Rekhviashvili is a post-doctoral researcher at Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography. She has recently defended her doctoral dissertation entitled Counterbalancing marketization informally: Institutional reforms and informal practices in Georgia (2003-2012) at the Doctoral School of Political Science, Public Policy and International Relations, Central European University. Throughout the last years she was a visiting doctoral fellow at the Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography and a research fellow at the Center for Social Sciences. Her research interests include: political economy, informal economic practices, post-socialist transformation, social movements, critical urban studies.
泭
泭